See who's verified. See who's vulnerable.
Report breaches confidentially.
New here? Start with Status Board to see who's verified, or This Week's Threats for the latest intelligence.
Businesses on our Status Board are measured against The Standard β 8 core security controls that prevent most cyber attacks.
Why "sexy"? Security is usually framed as a cost or checkbox. We call it "sexy" because when it's done right, it becomes a trust signal, competitive edge, and growth driver β not just protection. Businesses with strong security win deals, command premium pricing, and avoid the reputational devastation of a breach. It's not about fear; it's about aspiration.
See which local businesses are currently verified and their compliance status.
Complete the audit checklist to see if you qualify for the badge.
Get the weekly threat brief to stay ahead of active exploits and ransomware.
Security and operational readiness go hand-in-hand. Test and benchmark your inbound customer response speed on Response Radar β
Cybersecurity isn't just ITβit's about trust, reputation, SEO, and business survival.
60% of small businesses close within 6 months of a cyber attack. Basic security can prevent most incidents.
Source: Cybersecurity Ventures
Over 24 billion stolen credentials are traded on the dark web. Proper controls reduce your attack surface significantly.
Source: Forbes / Digital Shadows
87% of consumers will take their business elsewhere if they don't trust a company to handle their data responsibly.
Source: McKinsey & Company
Google uses HTTPS/Security as a ranking signal. Verified listings build "E-E-A-T" (Trust) for local SEO.
Source: Google Search Central
Proper security controls (like MFA) can lower cyber insurance premiums by up to 25-50% or make you eligible for coverage.
Source: Marsh / Global Insurance
Established frameworks (including FTC Safeguards guidance and NIST standards) emphasize that timely remediation of substantiated security risks is central to reasonable security. Accountability requires active oversight and documented response.
Source: FTC Guidance on Business Security
Prevention vs. Catastrophe
| Victim | The Fatal Flaw | The Prevention Tool | The ROI Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
|
π
Lincoln College
Closed (157 yr legacy)
|
No offline backups. Ransomware encrypted everything instantly. |
β Immutable Cloud Backups
~ $500 / month
~ $6,000/yr
|
$50M+ LOST
|
$6K PREVENTED
β Prevention cost < 0.01% of loss
|
|
π
Small Carriers
Liquidated fleets
|
Weak passwords + No MFA enabled. |
β MFA (Multi-Factor Auth)
$0 (Free Setting)
5 minutes to enable
|
BUSINESS COLLAPSE
|
$0
β Prevention cost < 0.01% of loss
|
|
π₯
Petersen Health
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
|
Unpatched remote access server (Citrix). Known bug left open. |
β Auto-Patching Software
~ $3 - $5 / device
~ $500/mo
|
$40M FROZEN
|
$500/mo
β Prevention cost < 0.01% of loss
|
Cyber defense isn't expensive. Recovery is impossible.
A verified business proves they have spent the pennies to save the millions.
We built this project after watching too many preventable breaches unfold the same way: known security basics were ignored, warnings were delayed, and customers, employees, and partners paid the price. The pattern was consistent across industries and company sizes.
Our goal is straightforward: make cybersecurity expectations visible, measurable, and understandable before an incident happens. When a business strengthens core controls early, everyone connected to that business is safer.
This verification directory began as a practical response to repeated owner-negligence scenarios and avoidable incidents seen in day-to-day advisory work. Instead of waiting for another post-breach cleanup, we published a clear baseline and made status public so business owners can act sooner.
We continue to refine the methodology using current breach trends and operational lessons from remediation engagements, but the core principle has not changed: prevention is almost always less costly than recovery.
Breach statistics consistently show that investing in foundational controls is materially more effective than relying on post-incident recovery. This site exists to make that reality harder to ignore.
A transparent process to separate the security leaders from the talkers.
Businesses may appear here through direct outreach, routine screening, professional contact, or third-party submissions. Verification is available voluntarily, but listings are not limited to businesses that received a formal invitation.
We evaluate their security controls against our published baseline criteria.
Businesses must remediate identified gaps or accept a failed / at-risk outcome if they ignore critical issues or refuse to engage.
We publish the verification status transparently for consumers and partners.
Participation in our verification program is voluntary. Passing it requires evidence. Businesses are evaluated on objective technical safeguards under The Standard, accompanied by an assessment of operational accountability and responsiveness when security concerns are identified.
To maintain credibility and fairness, our methodology strictly distinguishes between different tiers of evidence and observations:
p=none, absent headers, or low-cost hosting) serve as screening signals, NOT standalone proof of data breach or internal compromise.Technical tools alone cannot protect an organization without clear human ownership. How an organization responds to documented technical concerns reflects its operational governance. When a substantiated, material security alert is communicated through proper channels and met with repeated disregard, that breakdown is documented as an Operational Assurance concern.
What this does NOT mean: Non-response to a notification does not establish that a breach has occurred. Nor is declining a sales pitch, missing a meeting, or using specific software a security failure. Our evaluations focus strictly on documented organizational security processes and verifiable controls.
Paying for technology does not mean someone is managing it.
Subscribing to products is not the same as managing operational risk. Purchasing software does not automatically create ownership or active security oversight:
These products can be useful and properly secured. The problem is assuming their existence proves that someone owns the outcome.
Software is a tool. Accountability is a responsibility.
Security controls protect your business. Accountability ensures somebody acts when those controls fail.
Operational Assurance evaluates observable organizational conduct and security-governance practices separately from technical checklists. It evaluates documented business processes, escalations, and communication channelsβnot individuals' personalities, motives, or sales responses.
A business explicitly rejects a credible, material, documented cybersecurity concern without a reasonable technical explanation, alternate mitigation, or documented accepted-risk decision.
A credible and specific cybersecurity concern is delivered to an appropriate organizational contact, followed up through a verified secondary channel, and receives no substantive acknowledgment within a proportionate window (typically 7β14 days).
Documented, repeated bypassing of established security procedures, administrative controls, change-management protocols, or professional IT oversight.
An organization's security claim or attestation is materially contradicted by independently corroborated evidence. Organizations are given an opportunity to clarify or correct discrepancies before publication.
Repeated, documented failure to assign responsibility, coordinate remediation, or escalate material operational incidents where an identifiable duty and business risk exist.
Documenting supplier escalation dependencies, account recovery process limitations, and technical website maintenance observationsβdistinct from core Sexy Eight cybersecurity ratings.
The Technology & Vendor Accountability Watchlist tracks upstream operational escalation dependencies, distributor support processes, and narrow technical maintenance observations. These records evaluate specific documented workflows and configuration itemsβthey do not constitute blanket assessments of overall organization security, nor do they allege intentional misconduct or system compromise.
| Organization / Ecosystem | Domain / Channel | Documented Observation / Specific Control Scope | Operational Classification | Assurance Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Workspace | Cloud Identity & Productivity | Administrator-recovery process failed to produce a timely resolution in the documented escalation case. Established support-assisted recovery mechanisms stalled without automated resolution or clear timeline. This finding concerns account-recovery support velocity, not the general platform security of Google Workspace. | β οΈ Platform Recovery Β· Process SLA Limitation | Record limitation in supplier risk register; maintain secondary emergency recovery protocols. |
|
TD SYNNEX / StreamOne
Google Workspace Distribution
|
IT Distribution & Cloud Aggregator |
During an October 2026 support case involving a Workspace tenant not yet managed by TD SYNNEX, the distributor confirmed on October 14 that it lacked a direct escalation mechanism for the administrator-recovery issue presented. TD SYNNEX acknowledged this limitation and referred the matter to management. This finding concerns the availability of a specific escalation pathway, not the security of TD SYNNEX's systems or services.
Flag: Supplier escalation dependency, not individual misconduct.
|
β οΈ Supplier Assurance Β· Documented Limitation | Record limitation in vendor assurance; maintain independent escalation route and direct registry relationships. |
Cybersecurity Is Sexy verification is not contingent on purchasing technology or services from USTech.Ninja. Businesses may use their own IT department, an independent consultant, or any qualified service provider to meet the published security standards. Organizations can submit evidence of existing safeguards, correct identified deficiencies, and request verification without purchasing managed services from us. Our objective is better cybersecurity and stronger accountabilityβnot exclusive service relationships.
Already have an IT provider or internal team? Review our published standards, ask them to address identified gaps, and submit evidence.
Submit third-party attestation, questionnaires, or remediation records to verify your controls or update an existing listing.
USTech.Ninja provides comprehensive Worry-Free IT & Cybersecurity management to assess, remediate, and maintain your technology.
We scan each business's website using SecurityHeaders.com and note the grade on their verification listing. This check evaluates HTTP response headers that protect site visitors from common attacks.
Headers we look for:
max-age=63072000; includeSubDomainsDENYnosniffdefault-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; object-src 'none'; frame-ancestors 'none'strict-origin-when-cross-originImportant: This is an informational bonus, not a pass/fail requirement. Many small business websites built on Wix, Squarespace, or shared hosting cannot configure these headers without developer access. A low grade is noted on the listing but does not prevent Verified status.
Grading display on listing:
Verified - Managed: Active professional IT/security controls deployed and continuously monitored against the Sexy 8 baseline.
Verified - Validated: Meets the managed baseline and includes recent evidence checks against defined control thresholds.
Vulnerable: Baseline technical controls are unverified or documented technical deficiencies remain unresolved.
Operational Assurance (Optional Evaluation): Evaluates organizational conduct and escalation ownership separately from technical scores (Not Assessed, Reviewed β Clean, Review Pending, or Documented Concern).
Note: "MFA" is measured on critical systems (email + remote access) for baseline verification. Broader SaaS MFA and full-mailbox coverage are encouraged and may be required for higher validation tiers.
Need help meeting these standards?
These controls are standard inclusion in "Worry-Free IT" plans from our partner, USTech.Ninja.
Important Note: Our ratings reflect our own criteria and professional judgment. They are not legal compliance determinations and should be considered one factor among many when evaluating a business's security posture.
Real transparency about which businesses take cybersecurity seriously.
Verified? Get your badge β β’ Business Directory β β’ Partner Showcase β β’ Response Radar β
| Business Name | Location | Industry | Status | Headers | Last Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel Islands Mortgage β | Ventura County, CA | Mortgage Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| Channel Islands Law | Ventura County, CA | Legal Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| Reverse Mortgage Northwest | Pacific Northwest | Mortgage Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| OC Home Loans | Orange County, CA | Mortgage Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| Ellevate Insurance | Arizona | Insurance | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| Genrose Insurance β | Scottsdale, AZ | Insurance Agency | Verified - Managed | A+ | Sep 2026 |
| Lisa G Travel | Arizona | Travel Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| AZ Baum Plumbing β | Arizona | Home Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| Alyshaan β | Arizona | Professional Services | Verified - Managed | A+ | Mar 2026 |
| Erik Kelly Group | Arizona | Real Estate | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| DustSharkz | Tempe, AZ | Service Business | Verified - Managed | A+ | Feb 2026 |
| OCA Greater Phoenix Chapter | Scottsdale, AZ | Non-Profit / Community Advocacy | Verified - Managed | A+ | Sep 2026 |
Verification status reflects the published baseline and is updated as evidence and monitoring data are reviewed.
| Business Name | Location | Industry | Status | Headers | Reason |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| micro1 (micro1.ai) | Remote / US-based | AI / Talent Platform | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | N/A | Advertises legitimate IT/tech jobs, funnels candidates into AI video interviews, and uses responses to train AI models with no real hire. Glassdoor flagged a "Dangerous scam - personal data theft warning" and public complaints note early requests for passport/government ID. Passive technical note: Google Workspace MX, SPF uses ~all, DMARC is p=none, and the web front is Cloudflare/Webflow with HSTS, XFO, and a basic CSP. |
| Crossing Hurdles | Remote | Recruiting / Talent Broker | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | N/A | Front organization that funnels candidates into Mercor AI talent platform to collect referral fees. Public reporting cites fake high-salary listings, unpaid assessments, AI interviews, and bait-and-switch recruiting tactics. Passive technical note: Google Workspace MX, SPF includes Google/Mailgun/JobDiva, DMARC is p=none, and Netlify serves the site with HSTS, nosniff, referrer-policy, and permissions-policy. |
| Turing.com | Palo Alto, CA | AI / Talent Platform | Vulnerable - High Risk | N/A | Farms engineers and IT talent for AI training tasks under the guise of traditional job titles, with applicants reporting the funnel shifts from IT roles into AI operations and training work. Passive technical note: Google Workspace MX, DMARC is p=quarantine, and the Imperva front has strong headers but a very broad CSP / third-party dependency surface. |
| Sibitalent Corp | Remote / US-based recruiting | IT Staffing / Recruiting | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | N/A | Glassdoor review alleges the company asks candidates for government ID, SSN, and other sensitive documents, creating a direct identity-theft and impersonation risk for IT professionals. Passive technical note: O365 MX, DMARC is p=none, and the apex redirects to HTTP on www with only basic Apache response headers observed. |
| Mercor | Remote / US-based | AI Talent Platform | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | N/A | Appears in a connected recruiting ecosystem with Crossing Hurdles, micro1, and Turing. Public LinkedIn posts describe it as a predatory AI-talent ecosystem with referral farming, ghosted pay, and AI interview data harvesting. Passive technical note: Google Workspace MX, DMARC is p=quarantine, and the web front is strongly hardened but very dependency-heavy with a broad CSP and many third-party services. |
| Lucey Accounting | Arizona | CPA / Accounting Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Direct self-reported cybersecurity limitations and no follow-up remediation confirmation. |
| Go Gilbert | Gilbert, AZ | Real Estate / Community Platform | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Contacted owner on Feb 23, 2026 regarding identified security concerns. No remediation or verification response received. |
| Scottsdale Living | Scottsdale, AZ | Real Estate / Community Platform | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Contacted owner on Feb 23, 2026 regarding identified security concerns. No remediation or verification response received. |
| Living North Phoenix | North Phoenix, AZ | Real Estate / Community Platform | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | F | Contacted owner on Feb 23, 2026 regarding identified security concerns. No remediation or verification response received. |
| CH Winery | Unknown | Hospitality / Winery | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | F | Client-reported subdomain login flow transmitting credentials in plaintext. Immediate remediation and encrypted transport enforcement required. |
| Rod & Panel β | Scottsdale, AZ | Home Design / Window Treatments | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Primary domain is missing DMARC and DKIM records. SPF is present with hard fail (-all), but outbound email remains easier to spoof until DMARC and DKIM are configured. |
| Rosemary Bookkeeping (Goska Dabrowski) β | United Kingdom | Bookkeeping Services | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing SPF and DMARC records; no common DKIM selectors were detected. |
| Soles For Jesus (Yenh Mikolajewski) β | Wisconsin | Non-Profit / Humanitarian | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing SPF and DMARC records; no common DKIM selectors were detected. |
| Desert Land Group (Mai Luke) | Arizona | Real Estate Development | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing SPF record and no common DKIM selectors were detected. |
| PXG (PARSONS XTREME GOLF) (Daniel Convery) | Scottsdale, AZ | Sports Equipment / Manufacturing | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing SPF record on the primary domain. |
| Panasonic Solutions for Business (Jeff Russomanno) | Newark, NJ | Technology / Electronics | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure on the listed subdomain: missing SPF and DMARC records; no common DKIM selectors were detected. |
| Accent Building Restoration, Inc (Sugey Ostergaard) | Phoenix, AZ | Construction / Restoration | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing DMARC record. |
| My PC Techs | Phoenix, AZ | Technology Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing DMARC record. |
| Home Fur Good | Phoenix, AZ | Nonprofit / Animal Rescue | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Primary email-authentication gap observed on 2026-05-19: no DMARC record was returned for _dmarc.homefurgood.org. SPF is present and DKIM selectors responded, but the mixed Bluehost, Constant Contact, and Microsoft 365 sender footprint should be reviewed and tightened. |
| The Elyte Law Firm, PLLC | Phoenix, AZ | Legal Services / Criminal Defense | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Public website lists a consumer Gmail mailbox (`[email protected]`) as a primary client contact channel alongside firm-branded email, increasing intake confidentiality, account governance, and business-email-compromise exposure for a legal practice. |
| Journeys & Bridges Transitional Housing | Phoenix, AZ | Transitional Housing / Social Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Public-facing intake and contact workflows for a health-adjacent transitional housing provider rely on a consumer Gmail mailbox rather than a domain-managed business address, increasing confidentiality, governance, and business-email-compromise exposure for sensitive communications. |
| The Therapy Doctor PLLC | Scottsdale, AZ | Healthcare / Concierge Physical Therapy | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure for a healthcare-adjacent practice: no DMARC record was returned for the primary domain, SPF remains in soft-fail mode (~all), and no common DKIM selectors were detected. Escalated further due to lack of communication and no verification response. |
| linqd. | Gilbert, AZ | Technology | Vulnerable - Critical Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: missing DMARC record and no common DKIM selectors were detected. |
| DS Law AZ (Ahmed) | Arizona | Legal Services / Law Practice | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: missing DMARC record, no HSTS observed, and no Content-Security-Policy observed on the public website. |
| LocalFi (Kim) | Arizona | Marketing / Local SEO | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: listed domain redirects to localfiseo.com, missing DMARC record on the listed domain, and multiple common web security headers were not observed. |
| The Honey Foundation (Jaime) | Arizona | Non-Profit / Foundation | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none), and no common HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, or Referrer-Policy headers were observed. |
| helpful (Kirsten) | Arizona | Business Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Email authentication baseline failure: no DMARC record was found for the primary domain. |
| ACC Insurance Agency (Caleb Kemp) | Arizona | Insurance Agency | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: missing DMARC record, and no common HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, or Referrer-Policy headers were observed. |
| Priority Roofing (Jordan Robinson) | Arizona | Construction / Roofing | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none), and no common HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, or Referrer-Policy headers were observed. |
| Happy Light Company (Anthony Wilson) | Arizona | Home Services / Lighting | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Email authentication baseline issue: multiple SPF policy strings were observed in DNS TXT output, and DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none). |
| Blackstone Roofing Group (Shaun Bures) | Arizona | Construction / Roofing | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: missing DMARC record, and no common HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, or Referrer-Policy headers were observed. |
| Oppty Unlimited | United States | Small Business Consulting / Sales Operations | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none), SPF remains soft fail (~all), and no common CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, or Permissions-Policy headers were observed on the public website. Escalated further due to documented non-response after direct outreach and scheduled contact. |
| MNO Referrals | United States | Business Networking / Referral Organization | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none), HSTS is effectively disabled (max-age=0), and no common CSP, X-Frame-Options, Referrer-Policy, or Permissions-Policy headers were observed on the public website. Escalated further due to lack of communication and no verification response. |
| InsuranceProAZ (Bret Godsey) | Arizona | Insurance Agency | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Passive baseline failure: DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none), DNS TXT output appears to mix authentication policy text, and no common web security headers were observed. |
| The Neely Group | Phoenix, AZ | Financial Services / Financial Planning | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Escalated due to documented security-culture and leadership-posture concerns after professional engagement, combined with email security posture concerns that materially increase business-email-compromise and client-trust risk. |
| Prestige Accounting | Arizona | CPA / Accounting Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | B | Email security gaps: DMARC, DKIM missing; SPF soft-fail (~all), allowing trivial spoofing. Financial firm handling sensitive PII without basic email authentication poses a material BEC risk. Client portal (TaxDome) is segregated, but public communications remain unsecured. |
| Almeida Roofing Inc. | Phoenix / Maricopa County, AZ | Construction / Roofing | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Passive verification failure captured 2026-08-10: public business communications use a consumer Gmail mailbox ([email protected]), DMARC is present only in monitoring mode (p=none), and HSTS/CSP were not observed on the public HTTPS response. X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and X-Content-Type-Options were observed. This is a public baseline finding, not evidence of compromise or unauthorized access. |
| Margie Mae's Holiday Decor (MM Holiday Decor) | Arizona | Holiday Lighting / Seasonal Decor | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Critical email security baseline failure: No SPF, no DMARC, and no DKIM in place β allowing trivial domain spoofing from any sender. For a business that processes vendor payments and has documented DLP leakage events involving bank routing information, the absence of basic email authentication creates a material business-email-compromise risk. Additionally, no common web security headers (CSP, XFO, HSTS) were observed on the public website. Active phishing pressure was independently confirmed during a security review window, and the Guardz baseline score of 59/100 further supports the vulnerable classification. |
| Precision Auto Body | Tempe / Chandler, AZ | Automotive / Collision Repair | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | High local customer trust and strong collision repair standing, but critical technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary domain, allowing trivial domain spoofing and business email impersonation. |
| Dirk's Electric | Arizona | Contracting / Electrical Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Master licensed electrical contractor with strong industry reputation; technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary domain. |
| Hope for the Homeless | Arizona | Nonprofit / Community Outreach | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Grassroots community outreach nonprofit delivering essential aid; technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary outreach domain. |
| RN Patient Advocates of Arizona | Arizona | Healthcare / Patient Advocacy | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Clinical patient advocacy handling sensitive health intake; missing DMARC record and SPF soft-fail (~all), exposing client medical and care coordination communications to spoofing risks. |
| Nicki Fit A to Z | Scottsdale, AZ | Health & Fitness | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Active local fitness and mobility brand; email authentication in monitor-only mode (p=none) with DMARC policy not actively enforcing domain protection. |
| Brewers AC & Heating, LLC | Arizona | HVAC & Mechanical | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Established family-owned HVAC contractor; email authentication baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record, leaving billing and quote communications exposed to spoofing. |
| South Mountain Auto Detail | Phoenix, AZ | Automotive Detailing | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Mobile auto detailing provider with strong local customer reputation; technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary domain. |
| Interstate Auto Repair | Arizona | Automotive Mechanical Repair | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Longstanding automotive repair facility (member since 2017); technical baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record on primary domain. |
| EMG Barbershop | Arizona | Men's Grooming / Personal Care | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Concierge luxury grooming provider; technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary client booking domain. |
| Signarama Chandler | Chandler, AZ | Commercial Signs & Branding | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Commercial signage and architectural branding provider with broad commercial client base; technical baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record on primary domain. |
| Ahwatukee Flowers | Ahwatukee, AZ | Florist / Retail & Events | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Premier local floral boutique with high community standing; email authentication in monitor-only mode (p=none) with broad third-party marketing sender footprint. |
| ARC Renovations and Construction | Arizona | General Contracting / Remodeling | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Licensed general contractor managing high-value residential renovations; technical baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record on primary domain. |
| Hayes Insurance & Financial Services | Arizona | Insurance Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Independent insurance agency; technical baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record and SPF soft-fail (~all), posing business email spoofing risk for policyholders. |
| 30fold Benefits | Arizona | Legal & Identity Protection | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Legal and identity protection employee benefits advisory; technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary domain. |
| The Goodman Taylor Team | Ahwatukee / Phoenix, AZ | Residential Real Estate | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | East Valley residential real estate team; email authentication in monitor-only mode (p=none) with placeholder reporting address. |
| Kyrene Rotary Club | Ahwatukee, AZ | Civic & Community Service | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Active local civic service organization; technical baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record on primary organizational domain. |
| Community Action Security | Arizona | Security Patrol & Guard Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Physical security patrol and guard provider; technical baseline gap observed: missing DMARC record on primary domain. |
| Caring Transitions of Central AZ | Arizona | Senior Relocation & Estate Sales | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Senior relocation and estate management provider; technical baseline gap observed: missing SPF and DMARC records on primary domain. |
| Satya Yoga Center | Phoenix, AZ | Health & Yoga Studio | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Certified Iyengar yoga center; email authentication in monitor-only mode (p=none) with DMARC policy not actively enforcing unauthorized senders. |
| Advocate Planning Principles, Inc. | Phoenix, AZ | Financial Planning / Insurance | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Passive email-authentication baseline failure observed in September 2026: no SPF or DMARC record was returned for the primary domain. Public Arizona business records identify Advocate Planning Principles, Inc. as an active Phoenix finance and insurance corporation. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| OPACS | Arizona | Office Products / Business Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has Google MX and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none and does not enforce protection against unauthorized sending. Public company information identifies OPACS as a locally owned office-products and business-services company developed by Travis and Donna Kimmel. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| BIO-ELITE Training Systems, LLC | Scottsdale, AZ | Wellness / Fitness Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Passive email-authentication baseline issue: SPF was not returned, and DNS exposed conflicting DMARC policy strings rather than one clean, authoritative record. Public site identifies BIO-ELITE Training Systems, LLC as a Scottsdale fitness and executive-health provider; Arizona business records identify Gianni Del Franco with the entity. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Gryath Glass | Laveen / Phoenix, AZ | Automotive / Mobile Auto Glass | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Passive email-authentication baseline failure: no SPF or DMARC record was returned. Public site and Arizona Hispanic Chamber listing identify Gryath Glass as a Laveen-based mobile auto-glass, repair, and calibration provider. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Hana Entertainment | Phoenix / Mesa, AZ | Events / Entertainment | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has active Google MX and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none. The tested apex returned HTTP 404 while public event listings and Hana pages identify an Arizona event-production and entertainment business. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Gryphon Roofing & Construction | Tempe / Phoenix metro, AZ | Construction / Roofing | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has Google MX and SPF, but no DMARC record was returned. Public company pages identify Gryphon Companies, Inc. as an Arizona roofing, remodeling, and restoration provider operating since 1994. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Handyman Connection of Phoenix | Phoenix, AZ | Home Services / General Contracting | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has Microsoft 365 MX and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none. Public location pages identify the Phoenix operation, Allen Hopkins, the Northern Avenue address, and Arizona contractor license numbers. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Happy Bees Pest Control / Arcadia Pest Management | Arizona | Pest Control | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Listed domain has active mail routing and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none. The site redirects to Arcadia Pest Management, and public business results identify Arcadia as formerly Happy Bees Pest Control. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Back to Motion Chiropractic / Dr. Jennifer Polk | Scottsdale, AZ | Healthcare / Chiropractic | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Listed domain has active registrar-hosted mail, but no SPF or DMARC record was returned. The domain redirects to Dr. Jen Polkβs site; public pages identify Back to Motion Chiropractic in Scottsdale and Dr. Jennifer Polk as a licensed chiropractic physician. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| The Causey Effect / Bare Aesthetics | Scottsdale, AZ | Aesthetics / Nutrition / Wellness | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Listed domain has active Google MX, but no SPF or DMARC record was returned. Public records identify The Causey Effect, LLC and connect Christalyne Causey with the Scottsdale practice; the domain currently redirects to Bare Aesthetics. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| US Cleaning Solutions | Peoria / Phoenix metro, AZ | Commercial Cleaning | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has active mail routing and SPF, but no DMARC record was returned. Public site and business directories identify US Cleaning Solutions as a commercial-cleaning provider serving Scottsdale, Phoenix, Glendale, and the greater metro, with a Peoria address. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Western Alliance Bank | Phoenix / Nationwide | Banking / Financial Services | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Listed domain has Proofpoint MX and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none. The listed domain redirects to Western Alliance Bancorporationβs public site, which identifies Western Alliance Bank as a national commercial bank headquartered in Phoenix. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| One Handsome Bastard Distillery | Scottsdale, AZ | Distillery / Hospitality | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has Microsoft 365 MX and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none. Public site and local reporting identify One Handsome Bastard as a Scottsdale micro-distillery and grill at 7042 E Indian School Road, operated by the Ritchie family. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Window Coverings By Julie | Carefree / Scottsdale, AZ | Interior Services / Window Coverings | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Domain has active Google MX and SPF, but DMARC is only p=none. Public site and Scottsdale Chamber information identify the Carefree/Scottsdale window-coverings business, Julie Clark, and its showroom address. This is not evidence of compromise. |
| Golden Development Group (goldendevelopmentgroup.com) | Chicago, IL / National | Real Estate Acquisition | Vulnerable - High Risk | Not Scored | Unsolicited off-market property solicitation pointing to a domain registered 2026-07-30 (roughly two months old). The site brands itself "Golden Retreat - The Private Alternative to Listing" and describes itself as doing business as Golden Development Group, while the solicitation used the name "Golden Development" - the domain name does not match the brand it presents. No named principal, no real estate license number, no physical address, and the only published contact is a personal Gmail address. The domain name overlaps an unrelated, established firm at goldendevgroup.com. Passive technical note: no MX, no SPF, no DMARC and no DKIM - the domain cannot send or receive authenticated mail; DNS is hosted on NS1/Netlify and both A records resolve to AWS eu-central-1 (Frankfurt, DE). |
| Choice One Properties (choiceoneproperties.com) | Mesa, AZ | Real Estate / Property Management | Vulnerable - High Risk | F | Independent residential brokerage and property manager serving Mesa, Apache Junction, Gilbert, Chandler, Tempe, Queen Creek and San Tan Valley. The published contact is a personal mailbox on the business domain. Passive technical note: email authentication is unenforced - SPF ends in a hard fail (Google Workspace plus TopProducer/SendGrid) but no DKIM selector is published on the domain's authoritative nameservers and DMARC is p=none with no rua/ruf reporting address, so forged mail is both unsigned and unobserved. No CAA record. The site is an ASP.NET IDX build on the Listing Manager platform hosted on Azure App Service, answering directly with no CDN or WAF, and serves no HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options or Referrer-Policy. Plain HTTP does redirect to HTTPS and the TLS certificate is valid (Let's Encrypt, expires 2026-11-29). Findings are configuration observations, not evidence of compromise. |
| Instasold (instasold.com) | Phoenix, AZ | Real Estate / Lead Generation | Vulnerable - High Risk | C | Arizona buyer/seller brokerage and lead-generation business. This is a configuration finding, not a fraud report. Passive baseline failure: DMARC is published only in monitoring mode (p=none), and its aggregate reports are addressed to a third party at lovable.dev rather than the business, so forged mail from the domain is delivered and the monitoring feed goes elsewhere. SPF includes dc-aa8e722993._spfm.instasold.com, which returns NXDOMAIN, and an unresolvable include makes the entire SPF record a permerror. DKIM is present for Google Workspace. No MTA-STS and no TLS-RPT. The public site is a Lovable-built React application behind Cloudflare that serves HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy but no CSP, X-Frame-Options or Permissions-Policy, while it collects buyer and seller contact details. No CAA record and no DNSSEC, so any certificate authority may be asked to issue for the domain. Certificate transparency lists 23 names including twelve per-agent subdomains that publish staff first names and several live personal landing pages. The registration expiry on record is 2026-10-26. Server-side code and behind-login data were not tested. |
| Confluent Asset Management β | Scottsdale, AZ | Financial Services / Asset Management | Website Maintenance β Remediation Unverified | F | Reported unsupported server-side software (PHP 8.1.34 observed via HTTP header disclosure; PHP 8.1 reached EOL Dec 31, 2025). Nicholas Chavez was notified; underlying server configuration and current remediation status have not been independently confirmed. Narrow technical website maintenance finding, not an assessment of broader cybersecurity or client data custody. |
| DateNation β | United States | Online Dating / Social Community Platform | Operational Accountability Pending | Not Scored | Presents as a dating community connecting singles across America, but operates business communications through a consumer @gmail.com address with documented operational responsiveness concerns, including unanswered member inquiries and unmoderated submissions for extended windows. No verified operational or cybersecurity safeguards on record. Note: No specific cybersecurity breach or technical vulnerability has been established; this is an operational governance and communication infrastructure observation. |
| Talent Stacked | Bay City, MI | Staffing & Recruiting | Operational Reliability β Unverified | Not Scored | Confirmed a scheduled 15-minute call invitation (Oct 29, 2026, 10:20β10:35 AM MST) that specified a Google Meet link, then did not join that link at the scheduled time and reported the appointment as missed on the other party's side. The invitation was accepted in writing on Oct 27, 2026, the meeting room was open at the scheduled start, and a same-day offer to realign has not been answered. This is a scheduling-commitment and communication-reliability observation, not a cybersecurity breach or a technical vulnerability finding. Passive technical note: the primary domain publishes no SPF, DKIM, or DMARC record while operating Google Workspace mail, so outbound mail is unauthenticated β a configuration gap, not evidence of compromise. Server-side code and behind-login data were not tested. |
Vulnerable listings require evidence-based risk indicators. Non-response may strengthen the case for public listing, but the only public negative category is Vulnerable and each listing should carry a specific documented reason.
Remediation and Removal Policy
Businesses may request review after a listed issue has been remediated. When credible remediation evidence is provided, the listing may be updated to reflect that change. However, remediation alone does not automatically remove a business from public tracking.
If the originally observed issue is no longer present, the business will typically move out of the Vulnerable category and into Verified only after full validation against the published baseline. This is intentional: removal from the status board requires affirmative evidence that the broader security baseline is being met.
Need a listing reviewed after remediation? Submit for verification or open a support request via chat and include the business name, domain, the issue addressed, and supporting evidence.
Week of October 21 β 27, 2026 β "php2shell" CVSS-9.2 critical RCE in PHP core added to CISA KEV (BOD 26-04), Google Brotli zero-day memory corruption, Citrix NetScaler KEV escalation, GMO Internet Group $50M cloud extortion, and UNM Health Sciences trauma center cyberattack.
Current live brief. Older weeks are archived below.
Week of October 21 β 27, 2026. Information cutoff: October 28, 2026. Older reports archived below. Sources: CISA KEV, SecurityWeek, The Hacker News, BleepingComputer, CyberScoop, Ransomware.live.
Previous weekly threat intelligence reports
More archives coming as weeks accumulate. Historical data helps track threat trends over time.
Based on public records, government filings, and verified client notifications.
Have information about a local breach? Report it confidentially